627
>
77
matter was again referred to in para. 6
of our telegram No. 589. It is clear
therefore I that all that has been
agreed to by H.M.G. is that the Service
Departments should expedite the
examinati on of claims and decide in the
Ear case,
and
The facts
MA
light of their existing practice to what
extent they can properly meet the claims
- see para. 3 of our telegram No. 533.
J. appear.
I assume that this examination has now.
been completed and it should now be clear
to what extent the claims in question can
be met by U.K. departments. For the rest
Lave to any liability which may be admitted must
lie against the Hong Kong Government and
not against H.M.G. It is therefore
somewhat unfortunate that the question
accen
Lane
should be complicated by a suggestion of
dividing up the "total losses" in varying
percentages amongst the three Service
departments. In view of the correspondence
referred to above I am quite certain that
no purpose would be served in submitting
such a proposal to the departments concerned
To sum up H.M.G. must regard the
financial settlement as final and cannot
agree to accept responsibility for meeting
any further liabilities of the nature
referred to. Whilst your difficulties
in this matter are recognised, it must be
borne in mind that the settlement was
accepted locally even after the confusion
referred to above had been cleared up.
Moreover liabilities of a similar nature
had been accepted by the Malayan Governments
without question.
There is perhaps
/an
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.